Nope - once it leaves your network, all bets are off: technically, anyway. t
On 7/29/06 4:03 PM, "Kirby Boteler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoketh to all: > Even after the email makes it outside of our network, so someone that accesses > it from a different non-windows based application? i.e. mac/unix/et al > > ________________________________ > > From: Miha Pihler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sat 7/29/2006 6:00 PM > To: Kirby Boteler; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: MS Exchange > > > > Hi, > > Windows Rights Management Services can do that. It can prevent > forwarding, printing, etc. of e-mails and documents. > > Even if e.g. e-mail got out somehow only users with read permissions > will be able to open the e-mail... > > You can find more info here: > Windows Rights Management Services > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/rightsmgmt/defau > lt.mspx > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kirby Boteler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 11:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: MS Exchange > > In this regard, do you guys know of any software available that will > restrict a recipient from forwarding an email? Is this possible? > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Fri 7/28/2006 2:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: MS Exchange > > > > I agree with Thor on this one. It's a waste of time putting those > "legal disclaimers" on your emails. If you are afraid that an > unintended recipient may see the email, then it's in your best interest > not to send it. > > The only way that something like this would be legally binding is if the > email is encrypted and the recipient must accept that agreement before > decrypting the contents. > > The way that it's used today is much the same as blurting out phrases in > a crowded supermarket and then afterwards, telling everyone around that > they can't listen to what you just told them or repeat it in any way or > you'll bring legal action against them. How crazy is that?! > > Whoever puts these things on their emails are surely not thinking the > logic through enough. > > Thank you, > > Steve Bostedor > Bozteck President > http://www.bozteck.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thor (Hammer of God) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 1:36 PM > To: Focus-MS > Subject: Re: MS Exchange > > > Just as a matter of curiosity, does anyone have any *real* examples of > where those annoying "legal disclaimers" have provided any actual legal > protection or any evidentiary value? > > Most of the ones I've seen are insipidly stupid, saying things like "if > you have received this email in error, or are not the intended > recipient, you may not view, forward, print, or do anything for that > matter." Of course, you have to read the damn thing to get to the part > where it says you can't read it. And who defines "intended recipient?" > My server intended for me to get it, so I must be the intended > recipient. Or am I to be held legally liable for determining what the > intent of the original sender was? It all seems like a colossal waste > of time to me. > > t > > > On 7/28/06 6:51 AM, "Tupker, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoketh to all: > >> I've been looking into this a little as well. The cheapest way to do >> it that I've found, if you are using exchange, is with an SMTP event > sink. >> Many spam filters that I've seen have the ability to append text to >> emails as well. The only one that I can think of off hand is GFI Mail >> Essentials. http://gfi.com/mes/ >> >> I'm not sure if these would allow you to pull info from AD though. I >> hope this helps a little. >> >> >> Mike Tupker >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dave kleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:48 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: MS Exchange >> >> >> Can anyone recommend a auto-signature application that adds signatures > >> to outgoing email and those annoying legal disclaimers? >> >> It needs to black the user from making changes to the sig / > disclaimer. >> >> Additionally, it needs to pull variables from AD (e.g. Organization, >> Title, >> Department) >> >> Most important, it needs to work! I have tried a couple and they >> crashed and burned, either the sig did not pull AD info properly or >> the user could override it. >> >> >> Respectfully, >> >> Dave Kleiman >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> --- >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> --- >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ----- >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ----- >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
