How about a recursive acronym: *S*HINOLA *H*eroically *I*mplements an *N*ew
*O*bject *L*ambda *A*rchitecture

-Mark

On Nov 28, 2007 1:03 AM, Ryan Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On Nov 27, 2007, at 20:17 , Dan Ingalls wrote:
>
> > PS:  COLA, LOLA, , etc. -- these are all fine -- but before anyone
> > gets in the habit of using "*OLA", please read up on Shinola.
>
> tsk tsk dan... You HAD to go there... I was trying to come up with an
> acronym for CHOLERA and you brought up shinola...
>
> I present to you:
>
>        Streamlined Holistically INtegrated Object Lambda Architecture
>
> Sorry... I really couldn't help it. Tho', I do wish the (all)
> project(s) could focus on the goals/philosophy and code side of things
> and not worry about names so much.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> fonc@vpri.org
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to