what about MU ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_%28negative%29
"is it object or lambda ?" "is it a compiler or an interpret ?" "math or smalltalk precedence ?" ;-) On 28/11/2007, Mark Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about a recursive acronym: SHINOLA Heroically Implements an New Object > Lambda Architecture > > -Mark > > > On Nov 28, 2007 1:03 AM, Ryan Davis < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007, at 20:17 , Dan Ingalls wrote: > > > > > PS: COLA, LOLA, , etc. -- these are all fine -- but before anyone > > > gets in the habit of using "*OLA", please read up on Shinola. > > > > tsk tsk dan... You HAD to go there... I was trying to come up with an > > acronym for CHOLERA and you brought up shinola... > > > > I present to you: > > > > Streamlined Holistically INtegrated Object Lambda Architecture > > > > Sorry... I really couldn't help it. Tho', I do wish the (all) > > project(s) could focus on the goals/philosophy and code side of things > > and not worry about names so much. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > fonc mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > > -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://typo.cdlm.fasmz.org _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
