On Monday 09 June 2008 05:04:58 am Artur Kuptel wrote:
> http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/TAO.html
> Which is based on
> http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
> A very nice set of libraries.
> Artur K.

Ha ha ha... no, that's not quite what I was thinking of.  A search of "Amiga 
Tao Intent" pulled up a thread here 
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/13/tao_group_administration/comments/) 
with these comments:

> it is/was a set of virtual opcodes and an indefinitely large set of
> registers. 
...
>The virtual opcodes were translated to the host machine code, this could be
>done either in advance or on the fly. There is no interpreter. 

And this:

>ISTR Tao would seamlessly load-share across _any_ hardware platform for which
>an interpreter had been compiled and thrown into the network, not restricted
>to hardware with m68k interpreters.
>
>It was like a distributed computing Java platform on steroids, and it's shame
>to see such an innovative technology go to the wall. 

And sadly this:

>Actually, Taos, Elate, Intent et al were all based on something called VP,
>which was a virtual processor bearing more than a vague resemblance to ARM.
>Sadly, the development tools they provided were so utterly awful that nobody
>was interested, and by the time they finally provided a C compiler it was way
>too late.    


-Karl

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to