yes, thanks for that. it's a good read with good insights on many
aspects of why slower execution can be better.
However, Moore's law isn't working as well as it did.
Better ability to support concurrency without tears might well be a
disruptive technology that works slowly on a uni-processor but achieves
advantage on upcoming hardware architectures.
Regards,
Gerry Jensen
02 9713 6004
Dirk Muysers wrote:
Everybody in this discussion should have read the following:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&ved=0CAYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fresearch.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fum%2Fpeople%2Ftoddpro%2Fpapers%2Fdisruptive.ppt&rct=j&q=proebsting+%2Bdisruptive&ei=TUSMS8PRKYS80gSKpMjRCw&usg=AFQjCNGlGioXg3dL2G5rekpa-U8dKuZAtg
<http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&ved=0CAYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fresearch.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fum%2Fpeople%2Ftoddpro%2Fpapers%2Fdisruptive.ppt&rct=j&q=proebsting+%2Bdisruptive&ei=TUSMS8PRKYS80gSKpMjRCw&usg=AFQjCNGlGioXg3dL2G5rekpa-U8dKuZAtg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
