Hi, >Also, you can define the "complexity" of a graph in any way you like. > Until you show that this definition is somehow representative of the > real world, you're just masturbating.
IMO the problem is not in the method (or definition) used to take a desition and make an action. The real problem is that when the concecuences are observed/sensed, ... some people want to do the same again... and again... that is called iterations to redefine a better model of understanding in some contexts but it can be called the same way you have done. Ale. ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrey Fedorov To: Fundamentals of New Computing Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 5:09 PM Subject: Re: [fonc] System A vs B, what? The picture you gave isn't a system, it's a directed graph. I guess you're implying anything you imagine to be a "system" can be represented as a graph - but what is a system? Also, you can define the "complexity" of a graph in any way you like. Until you show that this definition is somehow representative of the real world, you're just masturbating. Cheers, Andrey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
