On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Casey Ransberger
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Isn't Nile kind of like a "read-also" APL?

I think you're referring to Nial. See also J and K.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nial
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_(programming_language)

> On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Florin Mateoc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> But wasn't APL called a "write-only language", which would make it in a way
> a polar opposite of Smalltalk?
>
> I agree that it is not about "consequences of message sending". And, while I
> also agree that uniformity/simplicity are also virtues, I think it is more
> useful to explicitly state that there are "things" which are truly
> different. Especially in an object system which models the world. Numbers
> would be in that category, they "deserve" to be treated specially. In the
> same vein, I think mathematical operators "deserve" special treatment, and
> not just from an under the covers, optimization point of view.
>
> Thank you,
> Florin
>
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to