On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:04 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[email protected]>wrote: > >
I'm just puzzled why you seem to be insisting that no other alternative to > Squeak's design is possible, when there are multiple existing systems > which demonstrate the opposite. > I never suggested there's no alternative. I suppose questions can have many valid answers depending on the level you ask them at ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BAM9fgV-ts - Why are we here?). You seem to be hearing the question at the level of whole implementation design, whereas I am hearing it at the level of micro-optimizations constrained by an existing design. Anyhow, I appreciate the reference to Self's implementation. It's an interesting read. Regards, Dave
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
