On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:38 PM, BGB <cr88...@gmail.com> wrote: > note that my definition of "fitness" also includes marketing forces and > economics. > for example, something can have be more "fit" because it has lots of money > invested into its marketing effort, ... >
I objected specifically to your mentions of '*merit*' and '*best sets of tradeoffs and/or being well suited to a various niche*', not fitness. I grant that 'fitness' is determined by the environment, but that has nothing to do with my objection.
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
