I started this +1 thing. It was indeed referring to Sean's comment (that is why Sean's comment was quoted).
I thought about this post before I made it. Normally I would not "spam" a thread with a "me too" comment, but in this case I thought that it was important to let everyone know that there are people who read this list and website who may not feel qualified to participate much but none the less rely on them as a vital source of information. Dave, I did not realize that you owned this topic. I wasn't even aware that you started this topic. If I infringed on your intellectual property rights, I apologize. As far as moving my comment to a new topic, that just doesn't seem reasonable to me. Starting a new topic with "I agree with what Sean said in another topic" seems to me to be a poor organizational structure. If I violated some list etiquette by expressing my opinion as +1, I do sincerely apologize. Perhaps my opinion is of no value. I doubt that I will offer any in the future, so there is no need to chastise me further. Regards, Joel On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM, David Barbour <[email protected]> wrote: > `+1`? Really? I seriously do not appreciate having my mail spammed in this > manner. > > If you're offering an opinion on the article, try to say something > specific and relevant to those who might have skimmed it. Which parts > interested you? > > If you're referring to Sean's comment for recording the outreach events, > please consider moving it to another topic. > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Julian Leviston <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 09/11/2011, at 6:30 AM, Kevin Driedger wrote: >> >> +1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! >> >> ]{evin ])riedger >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Joel Healy <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Joel Healy >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:49 AM, DeNigris Sean <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> On Nov 7, 2011, at 6:08 PM, karl ramberg wrote: >>>> > http://www.vpri.org/pdf/tr2011004_steps11.pdf >>>> >>>> It's so exciting to watch the project come along. I can't wait to >>>> eventually play with it! >>>> >>>> With every annual report, I think what a shame it is that there are so >>>> many talks given about it (~20 this year) and so few (~3) are recorded. >>>> Given the vital importance of this project, and all the work that must go >>>> into preparing the talks, it seems like a great waste to share this >>>> knowledge with only the few academics who happen to be at the various >>>> conferences. I attend about 6 conferences a year and still feel like I'm >>>> missing all the fun. Why doesn't VPRI just take the bull by the horns and >>>> record them even if the conferences don't? Consumer video equipment is so >>>> good now, it probably wouldn't cost anything but a few conversations - even >>>> an iPhone video could work! >>>> >>>> Sean >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> fonc mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> fonc mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> fonc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fonc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
