On 1/22/2012 5:30 PM, Dion Stewart wrote:
Is there a hard line between science and art?
I lean towards Richard Gabriel's and Kevin Sullivan's views on this one.
"How do artists and scientist work? The same."
<http://dreamsongs.com/Files/BetterScienceThroughArt.pdf>
I was actually going to argue something vaguely similar, but was more
busy with writing something else (a "professional musician" may not be
necessarily that much different from a scientist or engineer, and a "mad
scientist" may not necessarily be too much different from traditional
notions of an artist).
" How do artists and scientists work? The same
On Jan 22, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
On 22 January 2012 21:26, Casey Ransberger <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Below.
On Jan 21, 2012, at 6:26 PM, BGB <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
like, for example, if a musician wanted to pursue various musical
forms.
say, for example: a dubstep backbeat combined with rap-style lyrics
sung
using a death-metal voice or similar, without "the man" (producers,
...)
demanding all the time that they get a new album together
Only art is not science: it doesn't have pieces you can take apart and
reuse in the same way (technique does).
So it's not an analogy that works.
(I did a PhD in computer science, and I make my living as a singer.)
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
