VPRI folks appear to read posts on this forum, which takes time. I look at the traffic on this thread and am reminded of another on graphics that Dan Amelang took the time to make a lengthy, detailed response to ... which to me distilled to, if you have an alternative concept, deliver it in code and then we can discuss. Two people have posted that the Maru code at the end of the 2011 report does not run on the publicly available Maru engine? So how much time is being invested by this community in what is delivered? May I respectfully suggest that if we want more regular postings from VPRI, we improve the signal to noise ratio on this forum.
david On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Reuben Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23 January 2012 00:30, Dion Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there a hard line between science and art? > > No. > >> "How do artists and scientist work? The same." > > From my experience as both, true. > > I wasn't talking about differences between science & art, or in > differences between the way that scientists and artists do science & > art, but the significance of what they produce, and how they > promulgate the results. > > The bricks of science are independently useful much more than the > bricks of art are independently beautiful. > > -- > http://rrt.sc3d.org > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
