On 2/13/12 12:58 PM, David Nolen wrote: > Clojure is another Lisp that puts Objects at the bottom. Depending on > how its implemented I don't think it needs to be complex - for example > ClojureScript is hosted on JavaScript (which brings it's own Objects) > and the ClojureScript compiler is only about 1200 lines of Clojure. And > it delivers on the good onstage/backstage separation that Kiczales talks > about. Does Clojure, as it's designed, have the choice of not being being implemented on top of Objects? For example, has anybody implemented Clojure on Scheme? Would it be smaller?
I don't know enough about Clojure. :( More things to play with! :) > David Kurt _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
