Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891457
--- Comment #31 from Adrian Johnson <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #30) > So we agree perfectly with freetype 2.4.9 32-bit or 64-bit outcome, but not > 2.4.11 32-bit outcome. How did you build yours? I only tested with 64-bit. I don't have my 32-bit machine here right now and gcc -m32 doesn't seem to work on Debian. > This does not rule out cairo passing indetermined parameters to freetype > (like the signed/unsigned load_flags which are ~mask'ed, I mentioned > earlier) though. Does it make any difference if you change the signed to unsigned and run the testcase? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Wqh5BmTl3s&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
