https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284215
--- Comment #4 from Hin-Tak Leung <[email protected]> --- The bottom line is, if they have authorization to modify and re-distribute a microsoft font, they probably should remove the microsoft digital signature; if they are not microsoft and ships with a font with a microsoft signature, that's highly suspicious. One way of confirming copyright violation is to find the same digital digest on a genuine microsoft font. At the moment all I can tell is that the digital signature was signed around 2002/2003, so if this is a copyright violation, it would be a microsoft font shipped around that time, ie. windows XP-ish? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iin26ZecN5&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
