Around 6 o'clock on Mar 7, "James H. Cloos Jr." wrote:
> OK. I just figured out the (rather inane) error. I was comparing the > file sizes to the mag factor, not to the square of the mag factor. Are you saying that the size of the compressed glyphs is O(s^f) where 's' is the height of the glyphs and 1 < 'f' < 2? I was hoping we'd find a simple compression technique that could yield a value for 'f' of less than one; certainly the regularity of the data leads one to believe that it is possible. If we can find such a compression scheme, we can easily add it to the Render extension, both for glyph images as well as regular image data. Keith Packard XFree86 Core Team Compaq Cambridge Research Lab _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
