Around 4 o'clock on May 30, =?iso-8859-1?q?Andrew=20Dunbar?= wrote:
> > - The set of languages in the OS/2 table / FC_LANG > > is pitfully > > Can't you use coverage to determine this? Not easily. Traditional Chinese, simplified Chinese, Japanese and Korean fonts cover the same Unicode regions, and fonts for all of these languages generally cover only a fraction of the total space making any coverage based language tag only a guess at best. In particular, we'd need to call upon an expert in the area of the two Chinese varients to get an idea if there were any codepoints distinguishing the two. > For now yes. Romanian uses a "comma below" some letters which Unicode has > mapped onto a cedilla. This is a minor issue by comparison, but the same basic problem. We'll see if people using that language start to rise up in revolt as the Han language groups have, then we can start looking for yet another kludge. Keith Packard XFree86 Core Team HP Cambridge Research Lab _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
