* Andrew Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-30 04:52]: > --- Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On the other hand, all we really care about is Simplified > > Chinese/Traditional Chinese/Japanese/Korean so it may well be good > > enough. > > For now yes. Romanian uses a "comma below" some letters which Unicode > has mapped onto a cedilla. This has also been left as a font issue. > It's not as famous as the Chinese vs. Japanese case yet.
In recent versions of Unicode, the Romanian characters have been disunified, so now there are different characters for S and T with cedilla (U+015E, U+015E, U+0162, U+0163), and different with comma below (U+0218, U+0219, U+021A, U+021B). Two other well-known issues are italic Cyrillic letters, which have quite different Serbian and Russian forms, and (not as important, perhaps) acute accents in Hungarian, which are steeper than in most other Latin-based scripts. -- Alexandros Diamantidis * [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
