Arved: First of all, I apologize for my "end-user"-like demands. I think I pissed off Steve in the process. My apologies all around. Sometimes work demands make me miss the forest for the trees. Second of all, thanks for even taking a look at it. It helps tremendously to have such a dedicated group of "volunteers". Let me know if you need help going through the changes file or any other admin you wish to offload and I'll give it a shot. Anyway, enough gushing. I'm still converting from 0.18 to 0.20.2 so I have got my hands full. Let me know if you need any help. -Lou
Arved Sandstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 12:26:11 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ETA on 0.20.2 Hi, Lou It's probably easiest for me to fix up marker support, since I threw the existing code in there in the first place. It even worked, after a fashion, for a number of scenarios (although it didn't inherit properties from its virtual parent in the static-content, but rather from its lexical parent). So there is a lot already there. I apologise for not working on it. I have been hung up terribly on working on the CHANGES file in the latest distro- I am going to abandon that until we come up with a better system. So I should be able to work on markers, because in fact I have had enough time recently, I've just been pissing it away on one $@!&* administrative file. Regards, Arved Sandstrom On Monday 08 October 2001 17:39, you wrote: > Thanks. However, due to firewall issues, I can't get to your FAQ. I'm > going to pull the source code and start looking through it. > -Lou > > Alex McLintock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 12:38:26 PM > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > > Subject: RE: ETA on 0.20.2 > > --- COFFMAN Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No set date has been committed to. If you really need marker support, > > we'd > > > be happy to get any patches you'd care to send. We are, after all, > > developing on a completely volunteer basis. > > -Steve > > There was however at least one company willing to write patches on > a commercial basis. (Not mine - I'm too busy and don't know the source well > enough). > > Contact details in the FAQ. > > http://www.OWAL.co.uk:8090/asf/fop.jsp > > Alex > > > ===== > Alex McLintock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source Consultancy in London > OpenWeb Analysts Ltd, http://www.OWAL.co.uk/ > SF and Computing Book News and Reviews: http://news.diversebooks.com/ > Get Your XML T-Shirt <t-shirt/> at http://www.inversity.co.uk/ > > ____________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk > or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Fairly Senior Software Type e-plicity (http://www.e-plicity.com) Halifax, Nova Scotia Wireless * B2B * J2EE * XML --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
