It sounds as if you are more up-to-date on the keep-with-next status than I am, you may very well be right. I will check that out and repost.
Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Savino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:01 AM Subject: Re: FOP vs RenderX > I thought keep-together-with-next worked at the row level on .20.3. (W/o > going into an endless loop like .20.2 did if the selected group of rows > happened to span more than a page.) What is the final word on this? > > -Matt > > > Patrick Andries wrote: > > > > To be frank, although I have the same experience as Matt as far as speed > > (or lack thereof) of XEP is concerned, XEP is pleasant to work with > > (more syntax checking) and does support many more features (among which > > the absolutely essential keep-with-next for any professional looking > > document). > > > > I hear often that this may not be available soon in FOP, what does this > > mean a month, two months ? > > > > Patrick > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
