It sounds as if you are more up-to-date on the keep-with-next status than I
am, you may very well be right. I will check that out and repost.

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Savino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: FOP vs RenderX


> I thought keep-together-with-next worked at the row level on .20.3. (W/o
> going into an endless loop like .20.2 did if the selected group of rows
> happened to span more than a page.) What is the final word on this?
>
> -Matt
>
>
> Patrick Andries wrote:
> >
> > To be frank, although I have the same experience as Matt as far as speed
> > (or lack thereof) of XEP is concerned, XEP is pleasant to work with
> > (more syntax checking) and does support many more features (among which
> > the absolutely essential keep-with-next for any professional looking
> > document).
> >
> > I hear often that this may not be available soon in FOP, what does this
> > mean a month, two months ?
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to