On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 12:59, Alex McLintock wrote:
> At 09:40 13/05/2002, Keiron Liddle wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Since a new beta of batik has been released I think we can go with this
> >for the next release.
> You mean we'll go with the next *release* of Batik with the next release of 
> FOP...
> We aren't shipping beta software with our release are we?

Considering how FOP uses batik and what has been recently developed in
batik, the animations and scripting. I think this should be very stable
for its use within FOP. The main issue is about the api and this is an
improvement from the previous situation anyway.
Alternatively we could wait an indefinite amount of time where the
situation may still be the same.

I am simply removing a barrier to a release.

> Any chance of upping the version number of FOP to something like 0.91 
> because some people don't seem to like using software as low as 0.24

I didn't know making software was as easy as setting a number.

> Alex

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to