On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 12:59, Alex McLintock wrote: > At 09:40 13/05/2002, Keiron Liddle wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Since a new beta of batik has been released I think we can go with this > >for the next release. > > > You mean we'll go with the next *release* of Batik with the next release of > FOP... > > We aren't shipping beta software with our release are we?
Considering how FOP uses batik and what has been recently developed in batik, the animations and scripting. I think this should be very stable for its use within FOP. The main issue is about the api and this is an improvement from the previous situation anyway. Alternatively we could wait an indefinite amount of time where the situation may still be the same. I am simply removing a barrier to a release. > Any chance of upping the version number of FOP to something like 0.91 > because some people don't seem to like using software as low as 0.24 I didn't know making software was as easy as setting a number. > Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
