Alex wrote: > > Any chance of upping the version number of FOP to something like 0.91 > > because some people don't seem to like using software as low as 0.24
At 12:45 13/05/2002, Keiron Liddle wrote: >I didn't know making software was as easy as setting a number. I should have put a smiley in there but it is a serious point. Some people are not using Fop because of its low version number. You and I know that the version 1.0 will be the one which complies with the XSL:FO spec and we are a long way from that. FOP does not cope with the whole spec but it is quite satisfactory for many jobs. However there is a purely psychological problem with using software with such a low version number - it discourages some potential users. That is why I suggested skipping some version numbers but still keeping it below version 1.0 Ale Openweb Analysts Ltd, London: Software For Complex Websites http://www.OWAL.co.uk/ Free Consultancy for London Companies thinking of Open Source Software. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
