On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 16:32, Peter B. West wrote: > Keiron, > > I can't comment on the details of this unless and until I look at > avalon. I notice, though, that version is still given as a > configuration parameter. Does that mean that a user can arbitrarily > change the FOP version? My point, of course, is that version has > nothing to do with configuration. > > Peter
That is a bit of confusing. I never even noticed. That version is the version of the configuration, not the version of FOP. I don't think the FOP version has a place in this configuration. Keiron. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
