On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 16:32, Peter B. West wrote:
> Keiron,
> 
> I can't comment on the details of this unless and until I look at 
> avalon.  I notice, though, that version is still given as a 
> configuration parameter.  Does that mean that a user can arbitrarily 
> change the FOP version?  My point, of course, is that version has 
> nothing to do with configuration.
> 
> Peter

That is a bit of confusing. I never even noticed.
That version is the version of the configuration, not the version of
FOP.
I don't think the FOP version has a place in this configuration.

Keiron.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to