FYI, the temporary fix was to replace org.apache.fop.image.JpegImage in fop-0.20.3 and fop-0.20.4 with the version of this class in fop-0.20.2. Now JPEGs with ICC profiles come in as before.
Code questions: 1) Why isn't the org.apache.fop.fo.properties package included in the source? 2) Why do the Fop developers capitalize some method names? For example: public static FopImage Make(String href) Thanks again Jeremias, you were a huge help for us. Darrel -----Original Message----- From: Darrel Riekhof Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Black images Thanks Jeremias, I will check bugzilla. Thanks a bunch for the code hints, we will try that. Darrel -----Original Message----- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Black images Probably. Support was added for JPEG images to be embedded directly into PDF. Until then JPEGS were read into memory by Jimi and written to the PDF as a normal bitmap equal to the way GIFs and PNGs are written (using non-lossy ZLib compression). So probably, Jimi was able to open those JPEG images but something goes wrong today with the JPEGs that are directly embedded in a PDF. As the whole image support stuff is rather hardcoded at the moment, you might want to try to modify org.apache.fop.images.FopImageFactory and org.apache.fop.images.analyser.ImageReaderFactory to comment out JPEG support. That will restore the way JPEG images were handled back in 0.20.2. But you will get bigger PDFs. This is of course a short-term work-around. We still need to find out the real problem. Would you mind checking BugZilla, if there's already an entry for this problem? If not, please open a new bug report and add one or two of your problem-JPEGs as an attachment. This way we can fix it eventually. No idea if I get to have a look at it, because I wanted to work mostly on the redesign during the next few weeks. So takers are welcome. I hope this clears it up a bit. On 26.07.2002 20:37:51 Darrel Riekhof wrote: > We found the same thing. We also found that images with ICC Profiles display >correctly in FOP 0.20.2, but appear as black boxes in FOP 0.20.3 and 0.20.4. > > Anyone know what happened between .2 and .3 that would break this? > > Is there a way to strip out the ICC Profile of an image at runtime? Our users are >not terribly technical, asking them to not upload images with ICC Profiles may be a >little too much for them. > > Darrel Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
