Fopdevs, For those of you who are not subscribed to the xsl-editors list.
Comments please. I've been trying to track down the original discussion that triggered my request ot the editors, in hopes of being able to enter into the mind-set of inline-building again, but at the moment I'm just confused. Peter -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Regarding your comment about inline building on xsl-editors Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:37:10 -0500 From: Paul Grosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter, Thank you for your comment to [EMAIL PROTECTED] archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2002AprJun/0031 We determined that the spec required some corrections to address your question. We would appreciate it if you could let us know if you feel that our proposed changes sufficiently address your questions. The following is our proposed disposition of your above comment: --- We propose the following corrections to the spec: 1. the "Areas" portion of 6.9.2 [fo:basic-link] be changed from: The fo:basic-link formatting object generates one or more normal inline-areas. The fo:basic-link returns these areas, any page-level-out-of-line areas, and any reference-level-out-of-line areas returned by the children of the fo:basic-link. to: The fo:basic-link formatting object generates one or more normal inline-areas. The fo:basic-link returns these areas, together with any normal block-areas, page-level-out-of-line areas, and reference-level-out-of-line areas returned by the children of the fo:basic-link. 2. The same changes should be made to 6.6.2 [fo:bidi-override] and 6.6.7 [fo:inline], which have the same difficulty. 3. In section 4.7.3 [Inline-building] the following phrase (that describes the subject of the ordering constraints): the normal and/or anchor inline-areas returned by the child formatting objects, should be changed to: the normal and/or anchor inline-areas and normal block-areas returned by the child formatting objects, --- Please Reply (cc-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) if you wish to make an objection to our resolution. Thank you for your interest in XSL. Paul Grosso for the XSL FO Subgroup of the XSL WG --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]