[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am exploring the possibility of modifying the code to allow support for > keep-together. I'm pressed for time; so a hack will work. I would > appreciate any input on if this is possible and how long it would take?
Search the source for "keep-" (case insensitive), there is various code in place, commented out in many places. Enable the code and see what happens, and if this works for you. This is easy and fast. You'll probably soon encounter problems with non-terminating loops, duplicate IDs, dropped or duplicated content and other unpleasant effects. Usually the task gets frustrating quickly. In particular the issue with non-terminating loops is very hard to fix in general. Is there a reason why you can't use the usual work around of placing the stuff you want to have kept together in a blind table? J.Pietschmann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
