Joerg, Keiron, et al: I want to add my congratulations for the good work on the new web site. It not only looks good, but loads noticeably faster on my connection. I also see (and like) the "dev" tab.
As I understand it, the web site will eventually be updated daily automatically. This raises the question in my mind of how we (or any other project for that matter) will handle the differences between released versions and versions under development. Right now, for example, we have some doc that is basically for 0.20.4, and that we would want most users to find. However, we also have docs that are being updated frequently that are related to 1.0 (or the trunk or HEAD, if you will), which developers will want to find, and which those using cvs will want to find. I think it is useful to have both of these on our web site, perhaps on different tabs (??). Also, I have an html document that pulls together our "Implemented" and "Limitations" pages into one table with a column for each of the implementation compliance levels, color-coded to show what is complete and what is not. I did not see a DTD on the Forrest web site that fits this type of information. However, it looks like we can tell it not to validate certain documents. I'll be glad to convert it to XML with a stylesheet for HTML, or submit it as HTML. I'll also be glad to build and submit a DTD to Forrest, as this might be useful for other projects as well. I'm just not sure what is easier for you guys to deal with right now. What do you prefer? Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
