On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 10:04, Victor Mote wrote:
> Joerg, Keiron, et al:
> I want to add my congratulations for the good work on the new web site. It
> not only looks good, but loads noticeably faster on my connection. I also
> see (and like) the "dev" tab.
> As I understand it, the web site will eventually be updated daily
> automatically. This raises the question in my mind of how we (or any other
> project for that matter) will handle the differences between released
> versions and versions under development. Right now, for example, we have
> some doc that is basically for 0.20.4, and that we would want most users to
> find. However, we also have docs that are being updated frequently that are
> related to 1.0 (or the trunk or HEAD, if you will), which developers will
> want to find, and which those using cvs will want to find. I think it is
> useful to have both of these on our web site, perhaps on different tabs
> (??).

Some of these issues have been raised with forrest, but not answered as
far as I know.

The "dev" tab is actually meant to be the user etc. docs for 1.0dev,
maybe a better name could be used.

> Also, I have an html document that pulls together our "Implemented" and
> "Limitations" pages into one table with a column for each of the
> implementation compliance levels, color-coded to show what is complete and
> what is not. I did not see a DTD on the Forrest web site that fits this type
> of information. However, it looks like we can tell it not to validate
> certain documents. I'll be glad to convert it to XML with a stylesheet for
> HTML, or submit it as HTML. I'll also be glad to build and submit a DTD to
> Forrest, as this might be useful for other projects as well. I'm just not
> sure what is easier for you guys to deal with right now. What do you prefer?

With a stylesheet would probably be better.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to