On Friday 03 January 2003 22:19, Jarrod Stenberg wrote: > According to the recommendation a cell can exist as a child of a > table-body as well as a table-row Yes, but only the latter is implemented and works. The error message should prevent bad surprises.
> I also noticed that the recent snapshot, 20030103052138, does not have > this condition and related error. However, starts-row remains unused. The 0.20.5rc version comes from another branch than this snapshot. > I'm a relative newbie to Java, but I am willing to hunt for a solution to > this problem (what I view as a problem). Good luck! > Problem is, I'm a newbie to > working on Open Source code too. In what sense is this a problem? J.Pietschmann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
