On Friday 03 January 2003 22:19, Jarrod Stenberg wrote:
> According to the recommendation a cell can exist as a child of a
> table-body as well as a table-row
Yes, but only the latter is implemented and works. The error message
should prevent bad surprises.

> I also noticed that the recent snapshot, 20030103052138, does not have
> this condition and related error.  However, starts-row remains unused.
The 0.20.5rc version comes from another branch than this snapshot.

> I'm a relative newbie to Java, but I am willing to hunt for a solution to
> this problem (what I view as a problem).
Good luck!

>  Problem is, I'm a newbie to
> working on Open Source code too.
In what sense is this a problem?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to