Below is the result of my cross-checking. For each element and attribute, the first value (yes/no) comes from the schema and the second one comes from the file compliance.xml. The values tell if the element/attribute is supported. Then there is my comment.
Notes:
1. Individual compound properties (.minimum, etc.) are not listed separately in compliance.xml and thus are not compared
2. Only differences are listed, so the list does not tell when both sources are wrong ;-)
HTH,
Benoit Maisonny
element declarations: yes/no
element color-profile: yes/no
element title: yes/no
element block-container: yes/partial # this diff is OK
element leader: yes/partial
element page-number-citation: yes/partial # this diff is OK
element table-caption: yes/no #I'd say no: table-and-caption is not
element multi-case: yes/no
element multi-property-set: yes/no
attribute active-state: yes/no
attribute alignment-adjust: yes/no
attribute alignment-baseline: yes/no
attribute background-image: no/yes
attribute baseline-shift: yes/no
attribute border: yes/no
attribute border-after-precedence: yes/no
attribute border-before-precedence: yes/no
attribute border-collapse: yes/no
attribute border-end-precedence: yes/no
attribute border-separation: yes/no
attribute border-start-precedence: yes/no
attribute case-name: yes/no
attribute case-title: yes/no
attribute clear: yes/no
attribute color-profile-name: yes/no
attribute column-number: yes/no
attribute content-height: yes/no
attribute content-type: yes/no
attribute content-width: yes/no
attribute destination-placement-offset: yes/no
attribute display-align: yes/no
attribute dominant-baseline: yes/no
attribute ends-row: yes/no
attribute float: yes/no # I think it's no
attribute force-page-count: yes/no
attribute format: yes/no
attribute grouping-separator: yes/no
attribute grouping-size: yes/no
attribute indicate-destination: yes/no
attribute keep-together: yes/partial # this diff is OK
attribute keep-with-next: yes/partial # this diff is OK
attribute keep-with-previous: no/partial
attribute letter-value: yes/no
attribute margin: no/partial
attribute margin-bottom: yes/partial # this diff is OK
attribute margin-left: yes/partial # this diff is OK
attribute margin-right: yes/partial # this diff is OK
attribute margin-top: yes/partial # this diff is OK
attribute marker-class-name: yes/no # I think it's yes
attribute media-usage: yes/no
attribute number-columns-repeated: yes/no
attribute orphans: yes/no
attribute overflow: yes/no
attribute padding: yes/partial # this diff is OK
attribute position: yes/partial # this diff is OK
attribute precedence: yes/no
attribute relative-align: yes/no
attribute rendering-intent: yes/no
attribute retrieve-boundary: yes/no #I'd say partial: page only
attribute retrieve-class-name: yes/no # I think it's yes
attribute retrieve-position: yes/no
attribute scaling: yes/no
attribute scaling-method: yes/no
attribute show-destination: yes/no
attribute size: yes/no
attribute space-after: no/partial # I think it's partial
attribute space-before: no/partial # I think it's partial
attribute starting-state: yes/no
attribute starts-row: yes/no
attribute suppress-at-line-break: yes/no
attribute table-layout: yes/no # I'd say partial: fixed only
attribute target-presentation-context: yes/no
attribute target-processing-context: yes/no
attribute target-stylesheet: yes/no
attribute text-shadow: yes/no
attribute treat-as-word-space: yes/no
attribute unicode-bidi: yes/no
attribute vertical-align: yes/no # I think it's no
attribute widows: yes/no
attribute z-index: yes/no
Benoit Maisonny wrote:
Thanks, Victor.
I'll cross-check with what I have (Chuck Paussa's schema) and with my experience with FOP.
Is there a keyword or something else we can use to query bugzilla about these limitations? Or maybe they are not all listed?
Benoit Maisonny
Victor Mote wrote:
A couple of caveats: 1) The html version on our website is misleading
because the color-coding is scrubbed out in our forrest conversion (I am
trying to get that fixed). 2) The content applies to 0.20.5, not the main
branch. 3) The content might not be entirely accurate. It came from some
other documents, which I think were a bit out of date. It is really intended
as a good starting place. In particular, I think there are places where we
say that FOP is in compliance, but where there are some limitations that
need to be cross-referenced.
Victor Mote
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
