> ) Permission is hereby granted to copy and distribute this material provided > that the > ) copies are not made or distributed for commercial or lucrative purpose, and that > ) the contents are not changed in any way.
>I agree. >Should probably take a look at it and if we cannot distribute then remove them. >Maybe we could try to make them available in some other way. I used the license above because the old file did so. I think they came "as is" from the TEX sources, and the original licenses where kept. But my hyphenation file was written from scratch, and I have no objection to changing the license to match FOP's. However, I would like to add a matching Portuguese translation to the file, to keep consistency. Which license is to be used for the hyphenation files? The same used for the Java code, I supose? ============================================= Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral Petrobrás (http://www.petrobras.com.br) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ============================================= "A História é uma velhota que se repete sem cessar." Eça de Queiroz, in "Cartas de Inglaterra" "Keiron Liddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] om> cc: Assunto: Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns (was: 13/02/2003 23:52 HyphenationTree bug and Portuguese hyphenation file Favor responder a update) fop-dev > I'd say we can't keep something like that within our codebase because it > contradicts the Apache licence. It is entirely possible that someone > sells a product that uses FOP. That wouldn't violate the Apache licence > but the licence of this hyphenation file. Recent discussions on various > Apache mailing lists show that we shouldn't include anything in our > codebase that uses a licence that is not officially approved. I agree. Should probably take a look at it and if we cannot distribute then remove them. Maybe we could try to make them available in some other way. > I wasn't aware that the hyphenation patterns had their own licences. So, > the obvious conclusion is that we need to check every one of these files > and remove the ones that are not compatible with the Apache licence. > That includes checking where the files came from. > > Just for reference: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Licensing --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]