From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Moving to fop-dev because it gets technical...
:-)
I'm currently figuring out how best to solve this. I'm looking at the code from jpeg2ps which doesn't seem to have a problem with these JPEG files. The code in there is made to ignore any trailing bytes but processes the whole stream twice if I interpret correctly. Maybe looking for the EOI marker in our code and cutting off there is better performance-wise. But jpeg2ps' code is on the safe side in any case. Preferences anyone?
Sorry but this message arrived after I left on Friday. I dont have a preference. Out of interest, which option did you go for? Speed or mimicking the jpeg2ps code?
_________________________________________________________________
Find a cheaper internet access deal - choose one to suit you. http://www.msn.co.uk/internetaccess
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
