On 07.07.2003 10:28:59 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> >I'm currently figuring out how best to solve this. I'm looking at the
> >code from jpeg2ps which doesn't seem to have a problem with these JPEG
> >files. The code in there is made to ignore any trailing bytes but
> >processes the whole stream twice if I interpret correctly. Maybe looking
> >for the EOI marker in our code and cutting off there is better
> >performance-wise. But jpeg2ps' code is on the safe side in any case.
> >Preferences anyone?
> >
> Sorry but this message arrived after I left on Friday. I dont have a 
> preference. Out of interest, which option did you go for? Speed or mimicking 
> the jpeg2ps code?

I can't say for sure what the performance differences are between the
two solutions. Anyway I have chosen the quick & easy path and went for
the jpeg2ps-style approach since I don't have too much time available.

Jeremias Maerki

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to