> As we are all getting > our libraries > updated through CVS anyway, would it not be better > to name them > consistently, and include a text file detailing the > current versions? > > Peter > --
I don't think so--it is helpful to immediately see the version of the libraries when viewing the files. I suspect that text file you're mentioning will out fall out of date--and users may be unaware of it. However, there *may* be an issue (I don't know, I haven't researched the matter) of the team not relying on production releases of other jars, but interim releases where unwarranted, nightly builds, etc., which I would assume would make a mess in CVS due to the different file names, constant atticking, etc. *That* might be something to work on: attempting to rely on more production-release jars in the future. Glen __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
