I don't think so--it is helpful to immediately see the version of the libraries when viewing the files. I suspect that text file you're mentioning will out fall out of date--and users may be unaware of it.
I should preface this with: I've used CVS to submit *1* change, so I'm not exactly an expert here... ;-p
but...
Is it not possible to display the 'modified date' and/or 'version' in a separate column in CVS? I thought that was what 'Rev.' was for... I guess the 'Timestamp' relates to the time the item was added to the library, and not necessarily the file's 'modification date'. Hope this helps in some way...
However, there *may* be an issue (I don't know, I
haven't researched the matter) of the team not relying
on production releases of other jars, but interim
releases where unwarranted, nightly builds, etc.,
which I would assume would make a mess in CVS due to
the different file names, constant atticking, etc. *That* might be something to work on: attempting to
rely on more production-release jars in the future.
...sounds messy... Don't forget to wash your hands afterwards... -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
