J.Pietschmann wrote: > I'd suggest to restore the behaviour of the maintenance code > I expected this to be implemented this way anyway, because last > time I looked regions were handled the same order as in the > maintenance code). Vic, could this be an artefact of your changes?
It is certainly possible. Glen, if this is not easy to fix according to Joerg's comments, then I'll be glad to check out a snapshot from 3-4 weeks ago, and compare the behavior to what we have now to see if I caused this. Victor Mote