Don't bother--issue is not that important. I guess our general goal is to do what maintenance does for overlapping regions (which the spec doesn't address anyway but maintenance seems to handle nicely)--I may take a look at it later.
Glen --- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.Pietschmann wrote: > > > I'd suggest to restore the behaviour of the > maintenance code > > I expected this to be implemented this way anyway, > because last > > time I looked regions were handled the same order > as in the > > maintenance code). Vic, could this be an artefact > of your changes? > > It is certainly possible. Glen, if this is not easy > to fix according to > Joerg's comments, then I'll be glad to check out a > snapshot from 3-4 weeks > ago, and compare the behavior to what we have now to > see if I caused this. > > Victor Mote > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com