A veto must always be accompanied by an explanation. Without an explanation a veto is invalid.
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/voting.html Clay has never submitted any Java-related patches but he cares about the website (and has submitted patches in this area) and helps on the user mailing list. He regularly post suggestions which is also one way to contribute. He deserves the committership IMO. There's no rule that somebody must submit at least one Java-related patch to be accepted as a committer. On 28.12.2003 18:16:42 Glen Mazza wrote: > -1 (veto) > > Glen > > --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In recognition for his contributions to this project > > I'd like to propose > > "Web Maestro" Clay Leeds as a FOP committer. He's > > active on both dev and > > user mailing lists for at least 1 year now. He's > > actively helping out on > > the user mailing list and as our favourite > > nit-picker :-) he was > > instrumental in improving our website. Provided he > > accepts the > > nomination, I'd like to have him on the boat. > > > > +1 from me. > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > Jeremias Maerki
