It's not a veto, I just used that term to remind
others that committerships require a unanimous vote. 
My vote is still -1.  


--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A veto must always be accompanied by an explanation.
> Without an
> explanation a veto is invalid.

Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.

Reply via email to