It's not a veto, I just used that term to remind others that committerships require a unanimous vote. My vote is still -1.
Glen --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A veto must always be accompanied by an explanation. > Without an > explanation a veto is invalid. > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/