> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Pepping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<snip />
> All in all I think that this change simplifies the code, and would be
> a good change.
> Allow me to make some notes:
> 1. Would it not be a good idea to move Property.java from fo to
>    properties?

A question that was on the tip of my tongue too... I'd think: not only
Property.java, but all related Maker-classes as well.

<snip />
> 3. Should ToBeImplemented.java also be removed?

In the long run, that *should* be the objective indeed. For the moment, I'd
leave that right where it is, until we're sure we've no more refs to it
hidden somewhere else in the code.



Reply via email to