[Glen Mazza]

Another option, Finn, is to move all the Property subclasses to fo.properties (even if they're alongside
the makers, nested or unnested), after thinking about
it, I think that will be a little bit clearer than
having them in the datatype package. Comments?

I like it. How does this sound:

- Unnest Property.Maker to PropertyMaker and put it in fo.properties.
- Roll the datatypes classes into their property class and move the
  property class to fo.properties (but without unnesting their Maker
  class because the remaining nested Maker classes are really trivial).
- Move the handcoded maker classes to fo.properties.


Reply via email to