On Mar 3, 2004, at 1:23 PM, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
p.s. On second thought, maybe that'll be something I'll figure out myself (although it would be better if the legwork were already done! :-D)

I don't have intentions to install a 1.2 on my smallish and almost full HD. There were, however, *zero* complaints about problems running 0.20.4 or 0.20.5. There were some poeple stuck with an oldish IBM 1.1.8 (or even 1.0.x) JDK on some exotic platforms, therefore if there were problems for typical use cases, I expect at least one to report it. Users of the precompiled binaries wont necessarily notice any problems though.

J.Pietschmann

It's certainly a relief that there were no reported problems. I was concerned with this portion of your response:


Acutually I doubt FOP 0.20.5 will run completely in an 1.2 environment.
The binary is compiled with 1.4.1, and I vaguely remember compiling
problems already for 0.20.4 on 1.2.

...but what you're saying, is that there should not be problems for *binary* versions--only if users want to build from src themselves under 1.2.


If I understand things correctly, my response is "Sounds good!"

Web Maestro Clay



Reply via email to