--- Finn Bock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> [Glen]
> 
> > Finn, ***be very careful***, the definition of
> tree
> > extension was #2, *not* #1 (see previous email). 
> I
> > don't like its name, it should be OutOfAreaObject
> or
> > something like that.  
> 
> And why shouldn't extensions be allowed to create
> OutOfAreaObjects? Some 
> extension writers will needed that just like the
> author of fox:bookmarks 
> needed it.
> 

OK, now I see.  Thanks.

Glen

Reply via email to