Sounds good. --- Luca Furini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glen Mazza wrote: > > > Luca, I think we should be using getWidth() > instead of > > getW(), correct? > > Yes, it would be much clearer! > I'm going to rename: > getW() -> getWidth() > getY() -> getStretch() > getZ() -> getShrink() > getP() -> getPenaltyValue() > > The last name is quite long: I first thought of > getPenalty() or > getValue(), but they seemed less clear to me. > > Regards > Luca > > > >