Sounds good.

--- Luca Furini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Glen Mazza wrote:
> 
> > Luca, I think we should be using getWidth()
> instead of
> > getW(), correct?
> 
> Yes, it would be much clearer!
> I'm going to rename:
>   getW() -> getWidth()
>   getY() -> getStretch()
>   getZ() -> getShrink()
>   getP() -> getPenaltyValue()
> 
> The last name is quite long: I first thought of
> getPenalty() or
> getValue(), but they seemed less clear to me.
> 
> Regards
>     Luca
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to