I agree as well.
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:39:14AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I think, you are right. They should be abstract.
> On 04.01.2005 00:47:29 Glen Mazza wrote:
> > Any problem with making fo.InlineLevel an abstract
> > class? Any reason why you made it instantiable--or
> > was this just an oversight? (Actually, anyone know
> > why we're not making FObj and FObjMixed abstract as
> > well? I might be missing something here...)
> Jeremias Maerki
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl