Done. Thanks both for the quick response.
--- Simon Pepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree as well.
> Regards, Simon
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:39:14AM +0100, Jeremias
> Maerki wrote:
> > I think, you are right. They should be abstract.
> > On 04.01.2005 00:47:29 Glen Mazza wrote:
> > > Any problem with making fo.InlineLevel an
> > > class? Any reason why you made it
> > > was this just an oversight? (Actually, anyone
> > > why we're not making FObj and FObjMixed abstract
> > > well? I might be missing something here...)
> > Jeremias Maerki
> Simon Pepping
> home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl