Done. Thanks both for the quick response. Glen
--- Simon Pepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree as well. > > Regards, Simon > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:39:14AM +0100, Jeremias > Maerki wrote: > > I think, you are right. They should be abstract. > > > > On 04.01.2005 00:47:29 Glen Mazza wrote: > > > Any problem with making fo.InlineLevel an > abstract > > > class? Any reason why you made it > instantiable--or > > > was this just an oversight? (Actually, anyone > know > > > why we're not making FObj and FObjMixed abstract > as > > > well? I might be missing something here...) > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > -- > Simon Pepping > home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl > >
