+1
--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 from me. The code has been stable over the last > few months and seems > to work well for most cases. I also don't see any > other open issues > preventing a release. > > On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Batik is currently preparing for a release (be > that 1.5.1 or 1.6). > > Former Batik releases simply contained a > fop-transcoder.jar without > > having been released properly. That's why I'm now > calling for a formal > > vote for a release of our transcoders. The only > thing we do is tag CVS > > HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That > also means that we're > > not talking about releasing the whole codebase > here, only the > > transcoders plus their dependencies in our > codebase (PDF lib, PS support > > code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this > tag must be used by > > the Batik team to create their release. This > should ensure that the > > Batik release contains only clean code (meaning > without known IP issues > > and other showstoppers). > > > Jeremias Maerki > >
