+1

--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 from me. The code has been stable over the last
> few months and seems
> to work well for most cases. I also don't see any
> other open issues
> preventing a release.
> 
> On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Batik is currently preparing for a release (be
> that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> > Former Batik releases simply contained a
> fop-transcoder.jar without
> > having been released properly. That's why I'm now
> calling for a formal
> > vote for a release of our transcoders. The only
> thing we do is tag CVS
> > HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That
> also means that we're
> > not talking about releasing the whole codebase
> here, only the
> > transcoders plus their dependencies in our
> codebase (PDF lib, PS support
> > code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this
> tag must be used by
> > the Batik team to create their release. This
> should ensure that the
> > Batik release contains only clean code (meaning
> without known IP issues
> > and other showstoppers).
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 
> 

Reply via email to