Found it myself. It's the page-number and page-number-citation LMs which
cause bigger boxes than normal text. Test added, trying to fix it.

On 29.06.2005 18:26:26 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I'm trying to track this down but I get nowhere. At first, I thought it
> was the default for line-height which is 1.2em for both FOP Trunk and
> 0.20.5. Still, in Nils' example the document is much more compact in
> 0.20.5 than in the trunk.
> When I dial down the default for line-height in the trunk the result
> gets better but I'm pretty sure that's the wrong approach.
> Does anyone else have an idea? My bag-o-ideas is soon empty.
> On 29.06.2005 09:12:28 bugzilla wrote:
> > BTW, Nils' example shows again that we have another point to attend to: Our 
> > current nominal text box is much bigger than it was for 0.20.5. I've seen 
> > this 
> > before and I think we're approaching the time when this needs to be fixed.
> Jeremias Maerki

Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to