Excellent - I like the sound of it :-). Personally, after having now used the trunk a bit and seeing the test cases, etc., I would be a bit "bolder" and go for a name like "1.0 alpha" or "1.0EA" (I think that's the terminology Sun is using for unstable early releases). The big disclaimers still apply of course. To some extend it also depends on when we want to declare a feature freeze for 1.0, aim for stability and bug removal to get to a 1.0 beta and a 1.0 release. It must be pretty close as in terms of features/compliance the trunk code already vastly exceeds 0.20.5. I would therefore like to see the release plan extended to include a "rough" definition of 1.0 even if it is only as a delta to what we have now, e.g. something like this (Note is only an incomplete random example!!):
border-collapse="collapse" => 1.0 table-layout="auto" => post 1.0 fix/complete support for "fo:leader" => 1.0 writing-mode="rl-tb" => 1.0 writing-mode="tb-rl" => post 1.0 BIDI support => post 1.0 full support for font-family => 1.0 I hope that having something like this would help to focus and prioritize the work being done. Manuel On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:07 am, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > The subject says it all: > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ReleasePlanFirstPR > > This is open for discussion. I'd really love to get the first release > out by the end of September. > > Jeremias Maerki
