The current code works that way. The first free grid unit is used.
On 12.09.2005 11:22:19 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> The Rec describes the default value for the column-number on
> table-cells as:
> "For the first table-cell in a table-row, the current column number is
> My question: is this also true in case there was a row-spanning cell
> from the previous row that already occupies the first column? IOW: May
> we assume that in that case, the first "free" column-number may be used
> (taking into account spans from previous rows)?
> It's not all that difficult to track pending row-spans, so we could
> already take care of that when determining the initial value, and it
> makes more sense to me to interpret it that way, but just thought I'd